近期多位单口喜剧演员（如 Julia Jasunas、Mandy Martino 和 George Brett Olson）发现，他们在社群媒体上走红的喜剧片段遭到多个 AI 生成的性感美女帐号（如 Aylen Skye 和 Tiffany Sloane）一字不差地抄袭，甚至连语气词、舞台背景与服装都被精准复制。这些由快速进化的技术打造出的虚拟网红帐号坐拥数十万粉丝，通常会搭配更紧身的服装以及更佳的灯光与音效来重现原创笑话，借此吸引比原创影片更高的流量，并最终将观众导向 Fanvue 或 OnlyFans 等成人订阅平台以进行商业变现。
受害的喜剧演员们随即向 Instagram 母公司 Meta 检举这些侵权行为，但官方却认为这些帐号并未直接冒充原创者本人，而仅是挪用笑话内容，因此未违反现行社群守则。尽管 Instagram 负责人 Adam Mosseri 表示平台致力于将流量导向原创者并愿意探讨如何处理大规模抄袭，但实质上并未封锁这些在标示上不一致的 AI 帐号，这让创作者们感到极度无助，并强烈呼吁平台应在 AI 技术彻底失控前建立明确的保护机制。
在法律层面上，由于单口喜剧具有转瞬即逝的特性且段子在业界常有变体，笑话历来极难获得著作权保护，加上单一创作的潜在求偿金额通常不高，使得透过诉讼维权的成本远大于效益。与此同时，部分科技投资人甚至将这种抄袭引流手法誉为天才级的行销策略，而广大追求感官刺激的粉丝也毫不关心内容的真伪与原创归属，这种艺术家价值被彻底忽视的现状令真实的喜剧创作者们感到深切沮丧。
Recently, several stand-up comedians, including Julia Jasunas, Mandy Martino, and George Brett Olson, discovered that their viral comedy clips were being plagiarized verbatim by AI-generated hot girl accounts such as Aylen Skye and Tiffany Sloane, replicating everything down to their verbal fillers, stage backdrops, and outfits. Boasting hundreds of thousands of followers and powered by rapidly advancing cloning technology, these virtual influencers recreate stolen jokes with skintight clothing, better lighting, and superior sound to achieve even higher virality than the originals, ultimately funneling viewers toward adult subscription platforms like Fanvue or OnlyFans for profit.
The targeted comedians reported these violations to Instagram's parent company, Meta, only to be told that the accounts did not breach community guidelines because they were merely passing off the jokes as their own rather than directly impersonating the original creators. Although Instagram head Adam Mosseri stated that the platform is invested in driving traffic to original creators and figuring out how to address wholesale content theft, Meta has left the inconsistently labeled AI accounts active, leaving comedians feeling violated and prompting urgent calls for stronger creator protections before rapidly evolving AI makes the issue worse.
Legally, comedians have very little recourse because jokes have historically enjoyed minimal copyright protection due to the ephemeral nature of stand-up and common industry variations, while the relatively low financial stakes make litigation more trouble than it is worth. Meanwhile, some tech industry figures have praised these AI content farms as a genius marketing hack, and the hundreds of thousands of followers leaving thirsty comments clearly do not care whether the performers are real or who actually wrote the material, leaving human artists deeply demoralized over whether the creator still matters.