在美国总统 Donald Trump 与中国国家主席 Xi Jinping 预计于白宫举行会谈之前，双方正针对人工智慧的主导地位展开竞逐。中国顶尖模型的性能仅微幅落后美国竞争对手，但在成本效益比上保持领先。美中两国皆抗拒减缓发展的诉求，而中国外交部将安全担忧定调为冻结市场竞争的恐慌炒作。

美国政界与产业界内部对人工智慧的监管看法分歧，Anthropic 执行长 Dario Amodei 撰文警示人类生存风险，两党议员呼吁加强监管，而 Donald Trump 则斥之为骗局。相较之下，中国在儒家价值导向的治理下，将重心放在防范社会秩序、就业率、境内安全及政权稳定的侵蚀，对技术生存危机的焦虑感相对较低。

北京当局预计借由法规管制、技术标准制定与国家监督机制，在不放缓发展步伐的前提下管控潜在风险。Xi Jinping 提议建立类似联合国架构的全球人工智慧集中监管机构，但遭美国专家拒绝。由于双边皆将人工智慧视为经济命脉，双方在威胁认定与风险防范措施上仍缺乏互信。

Ahead of an upcoming White House summit between US President Donald Trump and Chinese leader Xi Jinping, the two superpowers are aggressively vying for artificial intelligence leadership. While China's top models trail US performance metrics by a slight fraction, they maintain a significant advantage in cost-efficiency ratios. Neither nation intends to decelerate development, with China dismissing safety alarms as anti-competitive fearmongering.

Domestic discourse within the US remains sharply polarized over regulatory stringency, contrasting Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei's warnings of human existential risks and bipartisan legislative demands for governance against Donald Trump's dismissal of such hazards as a hoax. Conversely, China's Confucian-aligned governance directs primary concern toward safeguarding social order, employment statistics, internal stability, and state authority rather than apocalyptic risks.

Beijing seeks to mitigate technological disruptions through comprehensive state supervision and standardized technical frameworks without halting progress. While Xi Jinping has advocated for an international, centralized UN-style regulatory body, the framework faces rejection from US specialists. Ultimately, both powers identify artificial intelligence as central to national economic output, yet profound distrust persists regarding threat definitions and security governance.