近期数学界因借助人工智慧解决拥有两百年历史的纳维-斯托克斯方程式难题而引发争端，Anthropic 与 OpenAI 为了这项突破的功劳归属产生激烈争执。这项争议反映出两大超智慧 AI 竞争者之间长期存在的裂痕，即使 Anthropic 执行长达里奥·阿莫代（Dario Amodei）近期呼吁放缓 AI 发展步伐，并获得山姆·奥特曼（Sam Altman）等人罕见的声援，双方依旧坚持继续训练新一代模型，使得共同合作应对风险的承诺充满变数。（关键数字：200）
OpenAI 与 Anthropic 之间的对立深植于历史恩怨，Anthropic 最初即由因理念不合而离开 OpenAI 的前员工于 2021 年成立，两者在人才、技术与商业市场展开全方位竞争，目前更竞相寻求超过兆美元的上市估值。双方的恶性竞争体现在各个层面，例如 Anthropic 因反对特定军事用途而遭五角大厦解除合作后，OpenAI 随即迅速介入接手合约；而在庞大的竞争压力下，Anthropic 甚至被迫放宽了其原先承诺的责任扩展安全政策。
两家公司在面对潜在灾难性风险时仍加速推进技术发展，背后核心在于强烈的意识形态与彼此不信任：双方皆深信自己才是负责任的 AI 开发者，深怕一旦单方面踩下煞车，对手造成的后果将更加灾难。这种自诩为「正义一方」的傲慢与恐惧，加剧了彼此的军备竞赛，然而在 AI 风险日益迫切的当下，产业领袖能否放下个人恩怨并落实真正的安全合作，已成为全球科技发展的关键考验。
The mathematics community was recently unsettled by the AI-assisted resolution of the 200-year-old Navier-Stokes equations, which triggered a bitter dispute between Anthropic and OpenAI over credit attribution. This controversy is the latest flare-up in a prolonged rivalry between the two leading contenders for artificial superintelligence. Even though Anthropic co-founder Dario Amodei recently urged for a slowdown in AI development—drawing rare support from OpenAI's Sam Altman—both organizations still insist on training next-generation models, leaving their commitment to the greater good in question.
The rift between the two firms is deeply personal, tracing back to 2021 when former OpenAI staff founded Anthropic to build a safer and more socially responsible AI company. Over the years, they have fiercely competed for talent, market dominance, and commercial contracts, and both are now racing toward public listings with valuations exceeding $1 trillion. This relentless rivalry was recently highlighted when OpenAI swiftly secured a Pentagon contract after Anthropic refused military applications, and Anthropic subsequently walked back some of its safety commitments due to escalating competitive pressure.
Driven by ideological convictions and mutual distrust, both companies continue to accelerate AI development despite acknowledging potentially catastrophic existential risks. Each leadership team firmly believes that it is the more competent steward of advanced AI and fears that stepping back unilaterally would yield worse results under its rival's control. Driven by hubris and the narrative of being the 'good guys,' this high-stakes race leaves the world watching whether these tech giants can finally overcome personal animosity to forge a safer collective path.