尽管需要不断分配资金和时间，但个人和组织往往非常不擅长设定优先事项。研究表明，人们经常低效地追求相互竞争的目标，而像乐高这样的公司曾因拥有多达100个关键企业风险而苦苦挣扎，从而稀释了太多领域的资源。

存在各种框架来指导资源分配，例如谷歌的70:20:10规则，该规则将70%的资源分配给核心业务，20%分配给邻近活动，10%分配给新想法。然而，即使确立了优先事项，麻省理工学院2017年对124家组织的一项研究显示，只有大约50%的高管对公司的战略目标达成一致。

成功的优先级排序不仅需要选择关注什么，还需要进行清晰的沟通，并明确停止现有的计划。像亚马逊这样的公司利用严格的“执行/终止”决策点来终止超出团队流失率或时间承诺预设阈值的项目。

Despite the constant need to allocate capital and time, individuals and organizations are often remarkably bad at setting priorities. Research shows that people frequently pursue competing goals inefficiently, while companies like Lego have struggled with having up to 100 key enterprise risks, diluting resources across too many areas.

Various frameworks exist to guide resource allocation, such as Google's 70:20:10 rule, which directs 70% of resources to core business, 20% to adjacent activities, and 10% to new ideas. However, even when priorities are established, a 2017 MIT study of 124 organizations revealed that only about 50% of senior executives agreed on their company's strategic goals.

Successful prioritization requires not only choosing what to focus on but also communicating it clearly and explicitly stopping existing initiatives. Companies like Amazon utilize strict "go/kill" decision points to terminate projects that exceed predefined thresholds for team attrition or time commitment.

Source: Too many people are shockingly bad at prioritisatio

Subtitle: Choosing where to focus is among the most important skills

Dateline: 6月 11, 2026 05:15 上午