AI正在成為歷史上最大的不滿製造機，其引發的反彈可能超過19世紀的盧德運動和美國民粹主義。經濟革命通常會破壞既有生活方式、加劇財富集中並剝奪人們的自主權，而AI技術的極速普及，正讓這些導致大眾憤怒的因素被無限放大，甚至帶來前所未有的反叛規模。

對AI的焦慮正在重塑全球政治，超越黨派界線，促使左右翼在反對科技巨頭和資料中心建設上結盟。這種反AI的民粹主義不僅會在主流政黨內部製造裂痕，還可能引發新的社會分化，將民眾的憤怒轉化為實質的政治壓力。

民眾的怨恨如果無法妥善處理，甚至可能演變成針對科技高管和資料中心的恐怖主義暴力行為。為了避免社會動盪，除了科技專家的努力，社會還迫切需要歷史學、哲學等跨領域學者的參與，以解決利益分配與技術衝擊等深層問題。

Artificial intelligence is becoming the greatest grievance-producing machine in history, potentially sparking backlashes that surpass the 19th-century Luddites and US populism. Economic revolutions typically disrupt established lifestyles, concentrate wealth, and deprive people of agency, but the unprecedented speed of AI adoption is amplifying these outrage-inducing factors, threatening rebellions on an unseen scale.

Anxiety over AI is reshaping the global political landscape and generating potential social conflicts. This anti-AI sentiment transcends traditional partisan boundaries, prompting left-wing and right-wing alliances against tech giants and data center developments. Such anti-AI populism will not only create fissures within mainstream political parties but could also drive new societal divides, translating public anger into substantial political pressure.

There is a critical risk of extreme behavior, necessitating an interdisciplinary response. If left unaddressed, public resentment could escalate into terrorism and violent acts targeting tech executives and data centers. To prevent societal instability, it is urgent to involve scholars from disciplines like history and philosophy alongside technologists, addressing deep-seated issues such as wealth distribution and the societal impact of technological change.